→ Pay attention
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3390 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | tourist | 3384 |
| 8 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 9 | turmax | 3319 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 5 | AmShZ | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2026 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Oct/03/2026 09:44:44 (h1).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
ok, you've found a cheater, find a way to prove them and explain them formally. Downvoted, everyone knows this!
Auto comment: topic has been updated by ermactually (previous revision, new revision, compare).
That's on the condition that you have proof.
I can see why ratism exists.
Use Graytist to lower the chances of being brainrotted by these low IQ blogs!
PS: I'm a graytist, not a ratist. Quite sure that I will become a greentist the second I reach specialist