Take a look at the tags on this problem:
FFT? DP? bitmask? is this an inside joke that im not getting? why does it seem like for every problem most of the tags are completely fake?
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
Take a look at the tags on this problem:
FFT? DP? bitmask? is this an inside joke that im not getting? why does it seem like for every problem most of the tags are completely fake?
| Название |
|---|



At least, now I can say that I solved a FFT problem.
there might be lots of solutions to a problem, maybe you can use those algorithms to solve it when you change the limits or sth?
oh i guess changing the problem constraints is fair. i was reading online that 1900+ are allowed to add tags so they could have considered that
even if there is real FFT solution writing it in 1000 problem is just overkill
anyone above 1900 can edit tags, someone probably decided to be very funny about it