Report of abuse of multiple accounts

#	User	Rating
1	tourist	3985
2	jiangly	3814
3	jqdai0815	3682
4	Benq	3529
5	orzdevinwang	3526
6	ksun48	3517
7	Radewoosh	3410
8	hos.lyric	3399
9	ecnerwala	3392
9	Um_nik	3392

#	User	Contrib.
1	cry	170
2	maomao90	162
2	Um_nik	162
4	atcoder_official	160
5	djm03178	158
5	-is-this-fft-	158
7	adamant	154
7	Dominater069	154
9	awoo	153
10	luogu_official	152

EnofTaiPeople, CJ_xde_pt, CJ_xde_lt belong to the same person (which can be easily verified, since all their submissions start with exactly the same macros and fast IO). These three accounts all attended at least one contest since June, which clearly violates the rule.

What makes me want to say this in a public blog is that, he recently posted a video (this video is in Chinese) of himself using a second account to have an additional 4 hours in the USACO Plat this December. In the beginning of the video, and in the comment section, he explained that he feels it's lawful, and he has the right, to create a second account and resubmit the code after debugging them. Later on, after his USACO accounts got banned, he started to act cool and spread hate in a group chat when asked why he would do this.

Clearly one should not violate the rules, and of course should not spread the idea that it's fine to break the rules, not to mention the fact that he is a gold medal winner of the National Olympiad and now attending the selection of the national team.

Since this three accounts EnofTaiPeople, CJ_xde_pt and CJ_xde_lt violate the rule regarding multiple accounts, sir MikeMirzayanov please ban these accounts.

Comments (5)

Write comment?

dXqwq

24 hours ago, # |

← Rev. 3 →

+71

Translation of the pinged comment by himself(by chatgpt, maybe inaccurate)：

I originally wanted to clarify, but I decided not to; the more I describe it, the worse it looks. Generally, I don't pay attention to the rules of "low-value competitions" online, and as you can see, I can still achieve high scores even if I don't follow them.
This is not against any regulations or laws in my country; at most, it might provoke arguments, which is quite interesting. However, I usually don't retaliate in an unfriendly manner, so it usually just passes. You can consider it as performance art.
I don't want to, and I won't, engage in arguments here.
Just don't follow my bad example.
Actually, I never think that my rule-breaking actions seriously undermine fairness. I believe that a more inappropriate approach would be discussing or asking others for methods during open competitions (like CF), which I never do, at least I never ask others.
It is recommended not to reply to this paragraph.

In my opinion, these words make totally no sense. Rules are rules. You can't just break the rule for "the contest is not important", "my score will be removed in final standings" or "this behavior doesn't affect other participants' rights". It's unacceptable for me.

→ Reply