Dominater069's blog

Invitation to CodeChef Starters 160(Rated upto 5 stars) — 13th November
By Dominater069, 10 days ago, In English

We invite you to participate in CodeChef’s Starters 160, this Wednesday, 13th November, rated upto 5 stars (i.e. for users with rating < 2200)

Time: 8:00 PM — 10:00 PM IST

Joining us on the problem setting panel are:

Written editorials will be available for all on discuss.codechef.com. Pro users can find the editorials directly on the problem pages after the contest. The video editorials of the problems will be available only to Pro users.

Also, if you have some original and engaging problem ideas, and you’re interested in them being used in CodeChef's contests, you can share them here. Hope to see you participating.

The number of problems in each division is as follows :

  • Division 1 : 4 problems + 1 subtask
  • Division 2 : 5 problems + 1 subtask
  • Division 3 : 6 problems + 1 subtask
  • Division 4 : 7 problems + 1 subtask

Good Luck!

UPD 1 : The contest has been postponed for 30minutes and will now start at 8:30 PM IST due to a technical error. We apologize for any conveniences.

UPD 2 : The top $$$5$$$ standings are here. Congratulations to the winners!

  1. Egor
  2. wwwwodddd
  3. potato167
  4. liympanda
  5. flytime
  • Vote: I like it
  • +44
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
9 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -58 Vote: I do not like it

Once again MATHCHEF / MATHFORCES

→ Reply
»
9 days ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +15 Vote: I do not like it

the contest is delayed by 30minutes

→ Reply
»
9 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +26 Vote: I do not like it

You guys always reject every single problem idea I propose without any feedback.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    9 days ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +31 Vote: I do not like it

    These guys also reject every submission I make

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    9 days ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it -35 Vote: I do not like it

    Its most likely a scam. I dont think they are interested in actually paying people.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      9 days ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +27 Vote: I do not like it

      a lot of people, both international and indians, have been involved in codechef setting before. Please do not make such wild accusations.

      → Reply
  • »
    »
    8 days ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

    For me they accepted the problem last december.

    Some back and forth communication and aren't replying now.

    → Reply
»
9 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

let me guess another round that is just a bunch of puzzles ?

→ Reply
»
9 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

how exactly is second character in S an 'a'? lol.

→ Reply
»
9 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Codechef never disappoints in disappointing

→ Reply
»
9 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

GuesStarters

→ Reply
»
9 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I gave div 2, the question A felt a bit harder than B and even C!

→ Reply
»
9 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I really liked the problems, more power to you guys!

→ Reply
»
8 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Div 3 B was a good question. I had this approach pruning the unnecessary 'b's out after 'a' to match it with regex b*(a(b*))* and then equating them, but took long time in implementing it.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    8 days ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    It's actually easier than that. Just make sure that the total number of a's and the number of initial b's are equal.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    8 days ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Just make sure the number of a's in both are equal and if so then the first occurrence of a should be same, as we can't add more b else before that.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      7 days ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      yea, implemented the same. thankyou.

      → Reply