Shayan's blog

By Shayan, history, 4 months ago, In English
  • Vote: I like it
  • +10
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

B1 + B2 detailed video tutorial

https://youtu.be/WIYtTD_-46k?feature=shared

»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -27 Vote: I do not like it

Solved Problem C using dp.It was a very fun round.

static PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(System.out); static FastReader s = new FastReader();

public static void main(String[] args) {

    int T = 1;


    T = s.nextInt();


    outer:while (T > 0) {
        T--;

        int n = s.nextInt();
        long arr[]  =s.readArrayLong(n);

        long count = 0;

        for(int i = 0 ; i < n; i++){
            if(arr[i] > 1)count++;

            if(arr[i]==1 && count > 0){
                System.out.println(-1);
                continue outer;
            }
        }


        long ans = 0;

        long dp[] = new long[n];

        for(int i =1; i<n; i++){

            if(arr[i]>=arr[i-1] && arr[i-1] !=1 ){

                long a = arr[i-1];
                long sum = 0;
                while(a < arr[i]){
                    a = a*a;
                    sum = sum+1;
                }
                long b = 0;
                if(a > arr[i])b++;
                if(sum <= dp[i-1]){
                    dp[i] = Math.abs(sum  -dp[i-1])+b;
                    ans = ans+dp[i];
                }


            }else if(arr[i] < arr[i-1]){

                long a = arr[i];
                long sum = 0;
                while(a < arr[i-1]){
                    a = a*a;
                    sum++;
                }

                dp[i] = sum + dp[i-1];
                ans = ans+dp[i];


            }



        }


        System.out.println(ans);




        // end of while loop
    }
}
»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How to find maximal value of a * i + b * j <= K, if 0 <= i <= N, 0 <= j <= M ?

I guess, solving it less than O(N), is solution for B2 + B1

  • »
    »
    4 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Here a+1=b, so we can do it without anything special. Let me explain how I processed each type of flower.

    1. Take as many flowers of type a with m coins. Calculate the number of petals.
    2. If b=a+1, take as many flowers of type b with the remaining coins. Increase the number of petals according to this.
    3. Now lets say u have chosen x flowers of type a and y flowers of type b. If the total number of flowers of type b is b_total, you still have the option to take b_total-y flowers, but dont have the coins for it. But you still can replace the flowers of type a which are already taken with flowers of type b which which are not taken by spending 1 extra coin (since a+1=b). So your number of petals can increase by min(x,b_total-y,remaining_coins).

    Do this for each type of petal a.

    The implementation can be different but this is the idea which helped me solve it.

»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

B1 can be easily solved using sliding window. But complexity will be O(nlogn) since need to sort the array.

  • »
    »
    4 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I sorted the array and was able to solve both B1 and B2.

»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

rainboy orz

»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Hi, I used mathematics to make the problem C a little simpler. Check my solution -

int n;
  cin >> n;
  vi a(n);
  read(a);
  int powcnt = 0;
  int maxel = a[0];
  int count = 0;
  for (int i=1; i<n; ++i) {
    if (a[i] == 1 && maxel > 1) {
      cout << -1 << endl;
      return;
    }
    double value;
    if (maxel > a[i]) {
      value = log2(log2(maxel) / log2(a[i]));
    } else {
      value = -1 * log2(log2(a[i]) / log2(maxel));
    }
    value += powcnt;
    if (value >= 0) {
      powcnt = ceil(value);
      count += powcnt;
      maxel = a[i];
    } else {
      maxel = a[i];
      powcnt = 0;
    }
  }
  cout << count << endl;
  • »
    »
    4 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I am not able to understand the intuition behind it. why we reversing the square when a[i]>maxel

    • »
      »
      »
      4 months ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      We are not squaring anywhere — The intuition is that for A^(2^x) to be <= than B^(2^y), given A (maximum element till now), x (the number of times we did the operation) and b (current element), we need to find y (the number of times we have to do operation for B), which turns out to be the above logarithmic equations after taking logs both side (twice).

»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Straight up 2 min code solving B1 is using two pointers. (Why this works?) is because the ranges is <= 1, so if all the elements were sorted then we can find the subarray of the sorted using 2 pointers.

include <bits/stdc++.h>

define INF_INT 2147483647

define what_is(x) cerr << #x << " is " << x << endl;

define all(v) v.begin(), v.end()

typedef long long ll; using namespace std;

void solve() { ll n, m; cin >> n >> m; int a[n];

for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) cin >> a[i];
sort(a, a+n);

int left = 0, right = 0;
ll sum = 0;

ll ans = 0;
while (left < n && right < n) {
    while (right < n) {
        if (sum + a[right] <= m && a[right] - a[left] <= 1) {
            sum += a[right];
            right++;
        } else {
            break;
        }
    }

    ans = max(ans, sum);
    sum -= a[left];
    left++;
}

cout << ans << '\n';

}

int main(void) { ios::sync_with_stdio(false); cin.tie(nullptr);

int i; cin >> i;

for (int n = 0; n < i; n++) {
    solve();
}
return 0;

}

»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Love it, thank you

»
4 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

for B1 using prefix sum with Binary Search worked for me, but could not apply the same to B2 :(