As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 159 |
5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
6 | djm03178 | 153 |
6 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 149 |
9 | awoo | 148 |
10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
Название |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
As you can see, the stack limit is always 256 MB. The difference is that the 64-bit compiler obviously consumes more memory (in this case, in the stack). Also, as of now, no compiler is judged under Linux.
Why do you say on Linux/Windows? There's nothing in these submissions indicating it, different compiler versions are unrelated to OS.