As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
| Name |
|---|



Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
As you can see, the stack limit is always 256 MB. The difference is that the 64-bit compiler obviously consumes more memory (in this case, in the stack). Also, as of now, no compiler is judged under Linux.
Why do you say on Linux/Windows? There's nothing in these submissions indicating it, different compiler versions are unrelated to OS.