In this blog, zh0ukangyang was banned because of the policy of using a single account. Few days passed, PinkieRabbit reached legendary grandmaster by Codeforces Round 941 (Div. 1). However, he was found as a cheater in this blog. He broke the rule of codeforces contest. We could clearly know that 'The contestants are forbidden to talk about subjects, related to the problems, with anybody, including other contestants' in Mike's blog. FIVE days passed, there is nothing happened to PinkRabbit. Is it too hard for Mike to solve this problem? I don't think so. The evidence is certain. So I can say there is no justice in codeforces?
Auto comment: topic has been updated by SkyWave2024 (previous revision, new revision, compare).
i believe its a matter of time it makes zero sense to let him be
https://codeforces.me/blog/entry/129181?#comment-1147049
Give him some time bro
this all reminds me of the people who say "just get better and cheaters will be below you and can't affect you anymore"
how many of them are lgm
PinkieRabbit is still a very strong contestant but it is unclear what level/type of punishment would be fit in a situation that serves as a proper deterrent. If it is true he was stripped of luogo admin position that is probably better than anything cf can do, I don't know what is proper besides skip all submissions in recent contests or maybe ban account (but he'll make another encouraging other unwanted behavior. they could erase all data on current but it'd be annoying from a historical perspective). Banning an alt account to enforce a single account policy is a pretty obvious decision in comparison.
What about you SkyWave2024? You are using an alt with image and nick similar to another person SkyWave2022 to hide your personal information and attract attention.
How can you write a post? You only have competed three times and solved >=1 problem twice in them. Are you trusted?
And it was written in his codes "author: sunkuangzheng"
cheater by all means
I'm so sorry, I am really sorry, I was wrong, can you forgive me pls ?
is