[submission:https://codeforces.me/contest/1774/submission/250501754]
i have checked everything but cant find the bug
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3638 |
| 4 | turmax | 3442 |
| 5 | tourist | 3380 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 7 | strapple | 3350 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | maroonrk | 3310 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 131 |
[submission:https://codeforces.me/contest/1774/submission/250501754]
i have checked everything but cant find the bug
| Name |
|---|



set<int>&. I don't see you modifying the set indfs2, so it is safe to pass it as a reference. If not, the complexity is raised to $$$N^2$$$ due to there are $$$N$$$ dfs calls and the set is copied each time. (The logn part grows slower than the set copy part.)you're copying the set object -> O(n) -> O(n2 * log(n))