[submission:https://codeforces.me/contest/1774/submission/250501754]
i have checked everything but cant find the bug
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3408 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 154 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 146 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
[submission:https://codeforces.me/contest/1774/submission/250501754]
i have checked everything but cant find the bug
| Name |
|---|



set<int>&. I don't see you modifying the set indfs2, so it is safe to pass it as a reference. If not, the complexity is raised to $$$N^2$$$ due to there are $$$N$$$ dfs calls and the set is copied each time. (The logn part grows slower than the set copy part.)you're copying the set object -> O(n) -> O(n2 * log(n))