[submission:https://codeforces.me/contest/1774/submission/250501754]
i have checked everything but cant find the bug
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3390 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | tourist | 3384 |
| 8 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 9 | turmax | 3319 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 144 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 136 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
[submission:https://codeforces.me/contest/1774/submission/250501754]
i have checked everything but cant find the bug
| Name |
|---|



set<int>&. I don't see you modifying the set indfs2, so it is safe to pass it as a reference. If not, the complexity is raised to $$$N^2$$$ due to there are $$$N$$$ dfs calls and the set is copied each time. (The logn part grows slower than the set copy part.)you're copying the set object -> O(n) -> O(n2 * log(n))