We will hold AtCoder Regular Contest 167.
- Contest URL: https://atcoder.jp/contests/arc167
- Start Time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20231015T2100&p1=248
- Duration: 120 minutes
- Number of Tasks: 6
- Writer: potato167
- Tester: heno239, maspy
- Rated range: — 2799
The point values will be 300-500-700-700-800-1200.
We are looking forward to your participation!
Why is F given 1200 score...
Wish I won't drop back to 1 Kyu.
emm...
Stuck at C for more than 45 minutes before trying D and realizing that it is pretty doable.
Is there any O(T) solution for E?
Oh I found such a submission. I only thought of solutions for S=2k,3k,3k+2, but there's a simple solution for S=2k+1.
In fact only one in-contest submission used extended gcd while the other 12 are $$$O(T)$$$
my last formula of my sol is similar to editorial >>why it give me wa on B
Because ans may not be even before you divide by 2. Correct answer is floor(ans/2).
okay thanks>>I changed the mod to 2 * mod and divide by 2 in the last and did not use 2^mod-2
Can anyone get me clear on the concept behind B? i did not get the editorial
Can anyone please explain why is my submission getting TLE for some cases where as it is running under 2 ms for all other cases.
I'm doing exactly what editorial says : B * product of (e_i * B + 1) for all powers of prime factors, finally dividing it by 2.
Overflow probably
why my solution fails?: problem B
my approach: we gonna factorize A and focus on one prime from the factorization: I need to know how mcuh p there is in the product of the divisors of a^b suppose a=p^k * .. so the number of this prime in the product is: (sum from 1 to k*b)* product of (ki +1) where ki is the power of the otehr primes sequencially.
after that I just divide by k why this fails? : https://atcoder.jp/contests/arc167/submissions/46638531
It's wrong. You don't divide by k, you multiple by B then divide by 2. You also have to make sure if the number is odd before dividing by 2. This is doable by checking if all the numbers you're multiplying are odd
Can someone explain solution of problem C?
I will try to explain my $$$O(n^2)$$$ solution, which is independent of $$$k$$$ in the problem. The editorial lists a different $$$O(n(k+\log n))$$$ solution.
My solution relies on the following observation, for fixed permutation $$$p$$$ applied to the array of values $$$A$$$:
To prove it, you can apply induction and in the inductive step, we can apply an exchange argument that relies on the fact that in the MST, the suffix from $$$j$$$ will be connected to the prefix before $$$j$$$. So you can apply the exchange argument according to which edge from the suffix component you remove and replace with the edge from $$$j$$$ to its prefix.
After this observation, the problem becomes simple: fix index $$$j$$$ and value of element $$$i$$$, and then count how many arrays exist with $$$max(A[j], min(A[j-k], A[j-k+1] \dots A[j-1])) = i $$$.
Submission
I think problem E would be a good math problem, but I don't think it's a good CP problem. It's so tricky that you can find 4 people who's rating is under 1600 among 13 people who solve the problem during the contest:(
About Problem B :Can anyone tell me why I set the mod 998244353 the answer was WA,but when I changed it to 998244353*2 ,it was AC ?
I wonder how the checker.cpp of problem E is implemented.
In other words, how to calculate the number of squares in a triangle satisfying the restrictions mentioned in the problem.