| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 136 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
| Название |
|---|



Auto comment: topic has been translated by Alexey (original revision, translated revision, compare)
It is well-known stuff that
sync_with_stdiodoesn't work in Visual C++.Hey, thanks for the info! Do you have any idea how make it work in Visual C++?
maybe u can use printf, scanf instead, if sync_with_stdio doesn't work?
I tried 169333336, but in vain.
Even if this stuff is well-known, I only read it today.
I think that Visual C++ is simply slower, there might be no way to make it work. Basically sending solutions in Visual C++ makes no sense.