1714A - Everyone Loves to Sleep
Idea: Vladosiya
Tutorial
Tutorial is loading...
Solution
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
#define int long long
#define pb emplace_back
#define mp make_pair
#define x first
#define y second
#define all(a) a.begin(), a.end()
#define rall(a) a.rbegin(), a.rend()
typedef long double ld;
typedef long long ll;
using namespace std;
mt19937 rnd(143);
const int inf = 1e15;
const int M = 1e9 + 7;
const ld pi = atan2(0, -1);
const ld eps = 1e-6;
void solve(){
int n;
cin >> n;
int time, h, m;
cin >> h >> m;
time = 60 * h + m;
int ans = 24 * 60;
for(int i = 0; i < n; ++i){
cin >> h >> m;
int t = 60 * h + m - time;
if(t < 0) t += 24 * 60;
ans = min(ans, t);
}
cout << ans / 60 << " " << ans % 60;
}
bool multi = true;
signed main() {
int t = 1;
if (multi)cin >> t;
for (; t; --t) {
solve();
cout << endl;
}
return 0;
}
Idea: MikeMirzayanov
Tutorial
Tutorial is loading...
Solution
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
#define forn(i, n) for (int i = 0; i < int(n); i++)
int main() {
int t;
cin >> t;
forn(tt, t) {
int n;
cin >> n;
vector<int> a(n);
forn(i, n)
cin >> a[i];
bool yes = false;
set<int> c;
for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (c.count(a[i])) {
cout << i + 1 << endl;
yes = true;
break;
}
c.insert(a[i]);
}
if (!yes)
cout << 0 << endl;
}
}
Idea: MikeMirzayanov
Tutorial
Tutorial is loading...
Solution
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
#define forn(i, n) for (int i = 0; i < int(n); i++)
int main() {
int t;
cin >> t;
forn(tt, t) {
int s;
cin >> s;
string result;
for (int d = 9; d >= 1; d--)
if (s >= d) {
result = char('0' + d) + result;
s -= d;
}
cout << result << endl;
}
}
1714D - Color with Occurrences
Idea: MikeMirzayanov
Tutorial
Tutorial is loading...
Solution
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
#define len(s) (int)s.size()
#define forn(i, n) for (int i = 0; i < int(n); i++)
using namespace std;
int ans = 0;
bool ok = true;
void Find(int a, int b, string &t, vector<string>&str, vector<pair<int, int>>&match){
int Max = 0, id = -1, pos = -1;
for(int i = a; i <= b; i++){
for(int j = 0; j < len(str); j++){
string s = str[j];
if(i + len(s) > len(t) || i + len(s) <= b) continue;
if(t.substr(i, len(s)) == s) {
if(i + len(s) > Max){
Max = i + len(s);
id = j;
pos = i;
}
}
}
}
if(id == -1) {
ok = false;
return;
}
else{
match.emplace_back(id, pos);
ans++;
if(Max == len(t)) return;
else Find(max(pos + 1, b +1), Max, t, str, match);
}
}
void solve(){
ans = 0;
ok = true;
string t;
cin >> t;
int n;
cin >> n;
vector<string>s(n);
vector<pair<int, int>>match;
forn(i, n) {
cin >> s[i];
}
Find(0, 0, t, s, match);
if(!ok) cout << "-1\n";
else{
cout << ans << endl;
for(auto &p : match) cout << p.first + 1 << ' ' << p.second + 1 << endl;
}
}
int main(){
int q;
cin >> q;
while(q--){
solve();
}
return 0;
}
Idea: senjougaharin
Tutorial
Tutorial is loading...
Solution
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <set>
#include <queue>
using namespace std;
int next(int x) {
return x + x % 10;
}
void solve() {
int n;
cin >> n;
vector<int> a(n);
bool flag = false;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
cin >> a[i];
if (a[i] % 5 == 0) {
flag = true;
a[i] = next(a[i]);
}
}
if (flag) {
cout << (*min_element(a.begin(), a.end()) == *max_element(a.begin(), a.end()) ? "Yes": "No") << '\n';
} else {
bool flag2 = false, flag12 = false;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
int x = a[i];
while (x % 10 != 2) {
x = next(x);
}
if (x % 20 == 2) {
flag2 = true;
} else {
flag12 = true;
}
}
cout << ((flag2 & flag12) ? "No" : "Yes") << '\n';
}
}
int main() {
int t = 1;
cin >> t;
for (int it = 0; it < t; ++it) {
solve();
}
return 0;
}
1714F - Build a Tree and That Is It
Idea: MikeMirzayanov
Tutorial
Tutorial is loading...
Solution
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
#define forn(i, n) for (int i = 0; i < int(n); i++)
int main() {
int t;
cin >> t;
forn(tt, t) {
int n;
cin >> n;
vector<int> d(3);
forn(i, 3)
cin >> d[i];
int sum = d[0] + d[1] + d[2];
if (sum % 2 == 0) {
vector<int> w(3);
forn(i, 3)
w[i] = sum / 2 - d[(i + 1) % 3];
vector<int> sw(w.begin(), w.end());
sort(sw.begin(), sw.end());
if (sw[0] >= 0 && sw[1] >= 1) {
vector<pair<int,int>> edges;
int num = 3;
int center;
if (sw[0] == 0)
center = min_element(w.begin(), w.end()) - w.begin();
else
center = num++;
forn(i, 3) {
int before = center;
forn(j, w[i] - 1) {
edges.push_back({before, num});
before = num++;
}
if (w[i] > 0)
edges.push_back({before, i});
}
if (num <= n) {
while (num < n)
edges.push_back({center, num++});
cout << "YES" << endl;
for (auto& [u, v]: edges)
cout << u + 1 << " " << v + 1 << endl;
continue;
}
}
}
cout << "NO" << endl;
}
}
Idea: MikeMirzayanov
Tutorial
Tutorial is loading...
Solution
#pragma GCC optimize("O3","unroll-loops")
#pragma GCC target("avx2")
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
#define int long long
const int maxn=2e5+5;
vector<int> ch[maxn];
int a[maxn];
int b[maxn];
int ans[maxn];
vector<int> vb;
int curb=0;
int cura=0;
void dfs(int x){
curb+=b[x];
cura+=a[x];
vb.push_back(curb);
ans[x]=upper_bound(vb.begin(),vb.end(),cura)-vb.begin();
for(int v:ch[x]){
dfs(v);
}
curb-=b[x];
cura-=a[x];
vb.pop_back();
}
int32_t main(){
ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
cin.tie(0);cout.tie(0);
int t;
cin>>t;
while(t--){
int n;cin>>n;
for(int i=0;i<n;++i) ch[i].clear();
for(int i=1;i<n;++i){
int pr,a1,b1;
cin>>pr>>a1>>b1;
--pr;
ch[pr].push_back(i);
a[i]=a1;
b[i]=b1;
}
dfs(0);
for(int i=1;i<n;++i) cout<<ans[i]-1<<' ';
cout<<'\n';
}
return 0;
}
Code for D is messed up a bit.
I implemented it in an easier way.
Mike Mirzayanov thanks for awesome editorial
Idk, awesome editorial in my understanding contains much more detailed and intuitive solutions with hints, this one is just ok.
Question D is a great problem,but why is the code for D so messy?
How to solve question D with DP? Can you tell me about it and share your code? If you can help me, I will thank you very much.
Here is my solution: 166798483
What does your dp[i] mean?
dp[i] is the minimum number of steps needed to color prefix(length is i) of text t in red.
use[i]: If an operation was done at a certain location, I recorded the selected subscript.
from[i]: Otherwise I recorded which operation the location was affected by.
dp is an array and i is the element position in the array
wth is this shit man. Stop it
This comment does not have enough downvotes for destroying almost the entire comment section of the editorial.
Indented solution of problem D from editorial:
"When you color a letter in red again, it stays red."
Missed this line during contest does this make the question similar to Jump game? ->where we can jump from index to any index in range (i,i+a[i])
Yes essentially the same problem. Here's my implementation using this idea.
https://codeforces.me/contest/1714/submission/169954163
The code for F: Build a Tree and That is it does not really clarify things mentioned in tutorial rather it has checks and implementations that makes it seem like the code to be working on a different idea. Can anyone either explain the tutorial or the code ? Thanks.
Can you help me with G.I checked ur code, but can't understand, Can u explain ur idea ? Thanks.
So, let's first make a DFS call and make array Asum[N], where Asum[u] stores the sum of all the A-values along the edges from root to node u.
Now notice that B values of all edges are positive. Let's pick any node u. And let's say, Path[u] = [B1, B2, B3, B4, B5,.....Bx] where the Bi indicates the B-values of all edges from root to node u.
Since Bi s are positive the prefix sum on Path[u] will only increase. Let's call the prefix sum on Path[u] as PrefixPath[u].
Since we want to know maximum prefix path that doesnt go beyond all A values sum in the path from root to u, the final answer for node u will be
Answer[u] = Largest index k in PrefixPath[u] such that PrefixPath[k] > Asum[u].
I can explain my idea of solution if it can help you.
Let's place $$$1,2$$$ and $$$3$$$ nodes. There is $$$4$$$ possible ways to do it: link to image
The first case: $$$d_{23} = d_{31} + d_{12}$$$. Let's check it, if it is right, then let's build our tree like in image.
The second case: $$$d_{31} = d_{23} + d_{12}$$$. Let's check it, if it is right, then let's build our tree like in image.
The third case: $$$d_{12} = d_{23} + d_{31}$$$. Let's check it, if it is right, then let's build our tree like in image.
The last case: let's see that $$$d_{12} + d_{23} + d_{31} \le n$$$, let's get loop for $$$d_{14} = [1..n]$$$ (sum of $$$n$$$ for all cases is $$$\le 10^5$$$ so we can do it), now we know $$$d_{34} = d_{31} - d_{14}$$$ etc. If all this right, then let's build our tree like in image.
If all cases are wrong, answer is NO.
Woah...Thank you so much. The image actually made your idea very clear. upvote_plus_plus
My Editorial for the problems I solved
Convert all the times hi mi to minutes. This can be done by multiplying the hour time by 60 and adding that to the minute time. Then calculate the minimum of the differences from the start time to each of the alarms. If the difference is negative, add 24*60 to it. Now that we've got the smallest distance in minutes, divide it by 60 to get the number of hours and take it modulo 60 to get the number of minutes.
166513127
I just used a map and filled it up with all the values in the array beforehand. Then I kept removing a larger and larger prefix of elements until eventually all the resulting elements were unique.
166516865
Recursion/Bitmasks Brute force. For each of the digits from 1-9, you have 2 choices: use it, or not. Just get all the 2^9 numbers and find the smallest one that works. This can be done by sorting the digits from smallest to largest and using that as your answer
166525073
To solve this problem I kept repeating the following process until all the elements were colored, or no more elements could be colored. Start from the first uncolored element and go down all the way to the first element. Then brute force all the possible input strings that can fit at that position and count the number of new elements that can be colored. If no new elements can be colored, then it's impossible to color everything. Otherwise, use the one that gave you the most new elements, mark those as visited, and move on to the element right after the end of that string.
166548769
My approach for this problem was quite messy but it surprisingly worked. There are 3 cases. Case 1: Only numbers that end with 0's and 5's are in the input. 2: Only numbers that end with 1's, 2's, 3's, 4's, 6's, 7's, 8's, and 9's. 3: A mix of both. It can be proven that there is no answer in Case 3. For Case 1: Just add 5's to all the numbers with a units digit of 5 and check if they are all equal. For Case 2, what I did is I first added 1's to all the numbers with unit's digit of 1. I did the same for numbers with unit's digits of 3, 7, and 9. This will then convert all the numbers to having unit's digits of 2, 4, 8, and 6, Then keep adding 20 to all the numbers until they are all less than 20 away from each other. 20 is special because it preserves the units digit and can be added using the operations. Now if there are multiple numbers that have the same unit's digit after adding 20, then there's no solution because it's impossible to ever make them equal. Now we just have (0-1) numbers with unit's digit 2, (0-1) numbers with unit's digit 4, (0-1) numbers with unit's digit 6, and (0-1) numbers with digit 8. Now for all 16 pairs, just check if it's possible to go from the smaller number to the larger number. This means that it is possible for them all to converge to a single value. This solution is really an overcomplicated version of most solutions, and the code is really messy and inefficent.
166575249
It was a very good contest D was interesting but i think you should reorder the problem like this B C A E D G F
B C A E G D F
B C A D E G F
I read the solution "Thus, we will apply the operation to each element of the array until its remainder modulo 10 becomes, for example, 2, and then check that the array does not contain both remainders 2 and 12 modulo 20." I don't know why do we need to check that "the aray does not contain both remainders 2 and 12 modulo 20". Why do we have to do that. Can you explain for me. Thanks
There are only 2 possible cycles when considered modulo 20 (2 -> 4 -> 8 -> 16 -> 2) and (12 -> 14 -> 18 -> 6 -> 12). If members of both cycles are present, you can never make all the numbers the same.
Code for $$$Problem D$$$ should be posted like this :
I think Vladosiya has forgotten to write
</spoiler>
at the end.Thanks for tagging, Fixed
In problem E, why flag12 and flag2 should not be true for the answer to be YES?
Remainders 2, 4, 6, 8 cycles and in that cycle number increases by 20. So difference between every two elements must divide by 20 (and these elements must have the same remainder modulo 20).
Why I got TLE ? What's wrong with my code[submission:166546367]
Is there a way to solve G using binary lifting
Yes 167804403
Could someone explain why this submission for G of mine get TLE ? I know it's inefficient but I still don't get why it doesn't work
First I do a dfs to precompute all prefix sums for a and b. Then for each leaf I find the path from it to the root, reverse the path, and use binary search for each vertices on the path to get the answer.
Hi can anyone help me figure out why my code for D is wrong? Thanks a lot! Basically I have tried to iteratively find the places with maximum coverage. However, it gives WA on a later TC.
Take a look at Ticket 16127 from CF Stress for a counter example.
Thanks! However, I am also interested to know why the editorial solution won't face the same problem as my solution.
Why in Problem D ,why does the algorithm in which selecting the word from which maximum red letters occurs in string s in a given step doesn't work.. According to my understanding .. If we don't pickup the substring of s in which maximum occurence of red happens in a step , then we can always pick it up later if the substrings of current picking doesn't intersect with the substring in which the maximum red occurence happens in a particular step. And if the substring intersect , then still we can swap the positions of picking of a substring in which maximum red characters appear in a step , the number of reds will decrease by the same. But , if one string is a substring in the strings in which we have to make it red. then picking the string with maximum red happens in a step is still optimal .. So , at each step just applying the operation with the string k[i] (1 <= i <= k) , in which the maximum new red characters which happen in a operation in string s is wrong.
Implementation of the Algorithm :- In the submission Link.
Wrong Submission Link :- 242502092
Question Id :- 1714D - Color with Occurrences