Wrong Answer in "GNU C++20 (64)" Accepted in "GNU C++17"

→ Pay attention

Before contest
Ethflow Round 1 (Codeforces Round, Div. 1 + Div. 2)
3 days

→ Top rated

#	User	Rating
1	jiangly	4039
2	tourist	3841
3	jqdai0815	3682
4	ksun48	3590
5	ecnerwala	3542
6	Benq	3535
7	orzdevinwang	3526
8	gamegame	3477
9	heuristica	3357
10	Radewoosh	3355

Countries | Cities | Organizations

View all →

→ Top contributors

#	User	Contrib.
1	cry	169
2	-is-this-fft-	165
3	atcoder_official	160
3	Um_nik	160
5	djm03178	158
6	Dominater069	156
7	adamant	153
8	luogu_official	152
9	awoo	151
10	TheScrasse	147

View all →

→ Find user

→ Recent actions

Detailed →

RubayedMunna's blog

Wrong Answer in "GNU C++20 (64)" Accepted in "GNU C++17"

By RubayedMunna, history, 3 years ago, In English

I have used same code. I got WA on 45 test using "GNU C++20(64)" compiler but got accepted using "GNU C++17" compiler. Why?

Here is The code: https://codeforces.me/contest/217/submission/151172349

RubayedMunna
3 years ago
3

Comments (3)

Write comment?

balalaika

3 years ago, # |

"I have used same code"... but no?

st.insert(parent1[i]);

st.insert(find_set1(i));

not same

→ Reply

RubayedMunna

3 years ago, # ^ |

-8

I think this is not an issue. Becaues, find_set1(i) returns value of parent1[i].

parent1[i] stores the parent of ' i '

→ Reply

balalaika

3 years ago, # ^ |

Did you read your own code? find_set1 change parent1

ll find_set1(ll v)
{
    if(parent1[v]==v)
    {
        return parent1[v];
    }
    else
    {
        return parent1[v]=find_set1(parent1[v]);
    }
}

And your AC code surely works in C++20 too.
https://codeforces.me/contest/217/submission/151179650

And your WA code surely too not works in C++17
https://codeforces.me/contest/217/submission/151179740

→ Reply