Anybody took part in NAIPC 2016? Let us discuss the problems here.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | djm03178 | 152 |
Anybody took part in NAIPC 2016? Let us discuss the problems here.
I cannot understand this question. Can anyone explain to me why the second example gives an output of 4? What is the moving strategy here? Thanks!
I had a weird WA during Round #300 (B) for the test case 415
. I used the custom invocation tool and realized that ((int) pow(10, i))
when i=2
is equal to 99 and the number
becomes 100
instead of 101
. On my machine, the same code passed.
Название |
---|