Anybody took part in NAIPC 2016? Let us discuss the problems here.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3846 |
2 | tourist | 3799 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3590 |
6 | Ormlis | 3533 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3463 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
9 | Um_nik | 3451 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 165 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 161 |
3 | Qingyu | 160 |
4 | atcoder_official | 156 |
4 | Dominater069 | 156 |
6 | adamant | 154 |
7 | djm03178 | 151 |
8 | luogu_official | 149 |
9 | Um_nik | 148 |
10 | awoo | 147 |
Anybody took part in NAIPC 2016? Let us discuss the problems here.
I cannot understand this question. Can anyone explain to me why the second example gives an output of 4? What is the moving strategy here? Thanks!
I had a weird WA during Round #300 (B) for the test case 415
. I used the custom invocation tool and realized that ((int) pow(10, i))
when i=2
is equal to 99 and the number
becomes 100
instead of 101
. On my machine, the same code passed.
Name |
---|