I've seen many people writing many header files explicitly and not using bits/stdc++.h. Does using ~~~~~ bits/stdc++.h ~~~~~
have any disadvantages?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 159 |
5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
6 | djm03178 | 153 |
6 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 149 |
9 | awoo | 148 |
10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
Disadvantages of bits/stdc++.h ?
I've seen many people writing many header files explicitly and not using bits/stdc++.h. Does using ~~~~~ bits/stdc++.h ~~~~~
have any disadvantages?
Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en3 |
![]() |
DessertKid | 2017-05-06 06:00:30 | 20 | Reverted to en1 | |
en2 |
![]() |
DessertKid | 2017-05-06 05:59:11 | 20 | ||
en1 |
![]() |
DessertKid | 2017-05-05 17:45:22 | 168 | Initial revision (published) |
Name |
---|