| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 144 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 131 |
Tips to Avoid Off-By-One Indexing Errors?
In today's contest, I found the algorithm to B relatively quickly... and then proceeded to get about 5 WAs due to off-by-one implementation errors :skull:
Are there any tips you guys use to avoid silly off-by-one errors with indices? IDK why but something about it just doesn't click for me in-contest. (Surely I'm not the only one with this issue...)
