| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Errichto | 139 |
| 5 | adamant | 136 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 7 | DNR | 133 |
| 8 | Dominater069 | 131 |
| 9 | Proof_by_QED | 130 |
| 9 | AmShZ | 130 |
|
+74
The only thing that can make you LGM in seconds is new year Magic which is just month away. |
|
+24
With Ashishgup as problem setter, we may expect some problem on turn-by-turn game (Source: 5 out of 7 of his contest has such problem). |
|
0
x=4,y=14. It will fail on lot of cases like this. |
|
+1
Today I got the notification that my solution 128612189 for the problem 1566C significantly coincides with solutions yashmittal19/128612189, ooz/128628009.Since ooz submitted solution around 25 minutes after me, so accusation is basically of sharing my solution. But I have not shared any of my code nor did I use sites like ideone. And even I don't know him. I don't know how to proof this but I have been giving contest regularly since last year and have never indulged in such malpractice. So I request admin to accept my solution. |
|
0
It seems really amazing and helpful. |
|
On
Namritaansh02 →
Single testcase alone gives right answer, but wrong answer when with other testcases., 5 years ago
0
This is because you are returning value in case n<=2 without taking up the complete input so that input is taken up in the next test case. |
|
0
Handle n=1 case separately. For n=1,ans will be arr[0] |
|
0
Can anyone help me by explaining why are we iterating 100 times rather than using normal binary search in problem 5 : Weakness and Poorness[problem:578C].Thanks! |
|
+3
Visit this site https://cfviz.netlify.app/ |
|
+50
Once I got wrong answer on test case 149.I thought that I may be missing some edge case. But eventually it turned out that my whole logic was wrong but still it was able to pass 148 test cases. |
|
0
Please predict my rating — yashmittal19 |
|
On
MikeMirzayanov →
Codeforces: Soon We Will Change the Rating Calculation for New Accounts, 6 years ago
0
It is really good idea.It would definitely stop multiple accounts formation and also would be nice to boost up confidence of new participant |
| Name |
|---|


