| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3638 |
| 4 | turmax | 3442 |
| 5 | tourist | 3380 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 7 | strapple | 3350 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | maroonrk | 3310 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
|
0
The number of prime factors will always be less than √n, So TC = O(√n) |
|
+33
2023 should not be a permutation |
|
+11
submitted editorial in 0ms |
|
+6
Woah, didn't know that, that's some crazy amount of time difference man. The vector solution is taking around 8000ms whereas pair one is running at around 250ms |
|
+3
What does that performance specify btw? My Card
|
|
+3
Was there any recalculation? |
|
+3
Pass the reference for This is ACCEPTED submission of your code. 1st Change In 2nd Change In Hope you got it right :) |
|
0
Congratulations, well deserved! This is really a very good post about the whole journey. Thanks for posting this, I've been stuck in the 1500-1600 range for a long time, about the loose hope, but Now I think I can still do it. Once again thanks for posting this. It means a lot to many people. |
|
0
I also used to be like this. Editorials were too much complicated to understand. I asked some of my friends and got some advice. Whenever you practice problems, even if you solve the problem try to look at the editorials of those problems too. It is useful because
|
| Name |
|---|


