| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 136 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
|
0
Nevermind, I got it. For subarray length 2 or greater, gcd will always be the min element, otherwise for length 1 the numbers are as it is present in set. Nice solution |
|
0
Can you please explain problem C as well? |
|
0
Thanks a lot for a detailed explanation. |
|
0
Yes my bad |
|
0
Sorry it was my fault. Please ignore the comment |
|
0
The constraints given in problem A are wrong thats why my solution did not pass The constraints for xi and yi given are 1 — 2*1000000 whereas actually the constraints are 1-4*1000000. Please correct me if I am wrong. You can see my submissions for problem 'A' Previous submission with given constraints New submission with change in only size of array 'ha' |
|
0
You can see my submissions for problem A. The only difference between two codes is size of array 'ha' |
|
0
The constraints given in problem A are wrong thats why my solution did not pass The constraints for xi and yi given are 1 — 2*1000000 whereas actually the constraints are 1-4*1000000. Please correct me if I am wrong. |
|
0
Can anyone elaborate the proof (or give in more simpler terms) of High Load? |
|
+1
I'm not clear about ternary search but is it not binary search? |
