| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
|
-10
I got a message saying that my solution for problem 1304E coincides with that of some other participants. I used the CP Algorithms implementation for LCA which you can find here: https://cp-algorithms.com/graph/lca.html. This was published before the start of Codeforces Round 620 (Div. 2) and so it does not count as a violation of the rules. Although I added a few additional methods in my source code, a big chunk of my solution was for the LCA structure. So I guess that could've set off the response. I hope this clears things up. If you need any more information, please let me know. |
|
+7
Not sure if I should be posting this here, but: I just got a message saying that my solution for problem E coincides with that of some other participants. This is likely because I used the CP Algorithms implementation for LCA which you can find here: https://cp-algorithms.com/graph/lca.html Although I added a few additional methods in my source code, a big chunk of my solution was for the LCA structure. So I guess that could've set off the response. I hope this clears things up. If you need any more information, please let me know. MikeMirzayanov |
|
0
Answer should be 10. Your code outputs 6. Once you take out the 1, you still need to take out the 4 and 5 again before you take out the 3. |
|
+1
I thought the same thing. I should really read questions more carefully next time. |
| Name |
|---|


