| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Errichto | 139 |
| 5 | adamant | 136 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 7 | DNR | 133 |
| 8 | Dominater069 | 131 |
| 9 | Proof_by_QED | 130 |
| 9 | AmShZ | 130 |
|
+13
For Problem F ; You can use SOS DP. Question Statement changed : We need to find out 2 substrings such that they contain different letters and are non overlapping. If we were to consider the strings as integers, where each character represents a bit ( where in set bit means that, the character is present ). For eg : binary for ac would be 101. Now you need to form all such numbers(strings which cannot have length more than 20, as then it would for sure contain a repeat).So insert all the strings starting at one position without having any repeated character. And then you need to check for each number whether it has a subset of its complement. We will consider the subset having the maximum number of set bits, which can be found out by simple SOS DP. Link to the solution : Using long long int (not required) : it may give tle as this solution : https://codeforces.me/contest/1234/submission/61652445 Using int : https://codeforces.me/contest/1234/submission/61743609 |
|
0
Great ;p |
|
+12
No it is not my assumption. Very simply, you can compare the memory of both of my solutions. Why open the documentation when you can code... LOL. Output : 1 2 |
|
+13
DP Solution for Problem E DP state : (node, cur, par) node -> The index of the node cur ( 0 or 1 ) -> Whether the given node either has or is supplied with an extra edge connecting it to the root par ( 0 or 1 ) -> Whether the parent of the given node either has or is supplied with an extra edge connecting it to the root Now 3 cases arise : cur:1 -> sum over all children {min(solve(child,1,1) + 1, solve(child,0,1))} cur:0 par:1 -> In this case the current node has a path of length 2 to the root by going to its parent and then from parent to the root. sum over all children {min(solve(child,1,0) + 1, solve(child,0,0))} cur:0 par:0 -> This is the most important case. Main Point : This node doesn't have a path of length atmost 2 to the root, so it has to make use of ATLEAST 1 of its children* Case 1: Leaf node -> You need to make an edge straight from here to the root. ans =1 Case 2: Internal node -> Select atleast one child from which you will make a direct edge to the root. Code for this : |
|
+1
http://codeforces.me/blog/entry/61399?#comment-453807 . Hopefully this comment of mine helps you to get an AC by using map only. |
|
+54
For Problem D — TLE issue People here find the Time limit strict ( even I did ) , but actually it isn't that strict. The only issue while using map which almost everyone is facing is : If u simply do ans += mark[digits][requiredmod]; then even though that required mod doesn't exist in the map, then also it will be added to that map and now the size of the map = (actualsize+1), and if you do this n*10 times the size of the map would increase and therefore the time to search as well So what u need to do is first search whether that element is present in the map and then add it to the answer, as shown below : if ( mark[digits].find(requiredmod)!=mark[digits].end() ) ans += mark[digits][requiredmod]; This is the only difference in my accepted and TLE solution. Accepted Solution : http://codeforces.me/contest/1029/submission/42081763 TLE Solution : http://codeforces.me/contest/1029/submission/42082128 |
|
-8
Absolutely Perfect. |
|
0
When will the list of winners of championship souvenirs be published ? |
|
+39
Why is rating predictor not working ? |
|
0
this happened because someone hacked it before u and was waiting in the queue for a longer time than u were. u didnt get negative because the problem was already hacked by someone else before so ur hack was not taken into consideration |
| Name |
|---|


