| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Errichto | 139 |
| 5 | adamant | 136 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 7 | DNR | 133 |
| 8 | nik_exists | 131 |
| 8 | Dominater069 | 131 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 130 |
|
+12
Yesssss!!!! I've been waiting for this >:D |
|
-15
Please make the pretest as strong as you can (/ T — T )/ . |
|
+9
Woah editorial published very fast! Thanks FieryPhoenix for the contest <3 |
|
+35
I've been waiting this for so long. GLHF! |
|
+3
EDIT: For every weight, while it is available to put them in the packet 1, put 'em. else go to packet 2 and so on. |
|
+8
In case you don't understand the question: You can assume the problems like this,
Test case 2: 6 10 5 8 1 10 8 7 6 6 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 N=6 K=10 Items = {1,5,8,8,7,10} C = {6,6,4,4,3,2,2,2,1,1} Answer: You can separate the items into {10,8,1} and {8,5,7} or {10,7,5,1} and {8,8} or even {10,8,5,1} and {8,7}. You can check my solution : https://codeforces.me/contest/1342/submission/78196440 (it's kind a mess tho) In overall, my greedy solution goes with: -Put the highest weight as the priority -While it is available to put them in the packet 1, put 'em. else go to packet 2 and so on. |
| Name |
|---|


