→ Pay attention
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 145 |
| 4 | Errichto | 139 |
| 5 | adamant | 136 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 7 | nik_exists | 133 |
| 7 | DNR | 133 |
| 9 | AmShZ | 130 |
| 10 | Dominater069 | 129 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Comments
|
+1
OK |
|
0
how to use find_by_order if I'm using ordered_set with pairs. ~~~~~ typedef tree< pair<int, int>, null_type, less<pair<int, int>>, rb_tree_tag, tree_order_statistics_node_update> ordered_set; ~~~~~ |
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2026 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Sep/04/2026 03:51:05 (h1).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
