→ Pay attention
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3408 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 154 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 146 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Comments
|
On
CosmicNoise →
an OBVIOUS flaw in ICPC India Regionals Selection Criteria: A Request for Rectification, 23 months ago
0
Yes I mean splitting the ranklist only makes sense (and the closest thing which makes sense) if and only if a proper union is taken. If they dont want to increase the seats, then maybe manually check the code for the last problem and choose the valid ones(who solved 4) over the ones who are getting selected only because of R2(by solving 3). |
|
On
CosmicNoise →
an OBVIOUS flaw in ICPC India Regionals Selection Criteria: A Request for Rectification, 23 months ago
0
Auto comment: topic has been updated by CosmicNoise (previous revision, new revision, compare). |
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2026 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Nov/11/2026 05:56:54 (k1).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
