| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 136 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
|
+51
To elaborate, I would bet on days taken to disprove rather than its true or false. It will be disproved within 5 days. |
|
+42
RP is as good as P to be honest. One would rather use a RP solution than even a approximation/ machine learning algorithm. If it was true, corona would seem like a small insect. And we could all take vacation for a year, because the economic help would be much larger is NP==RP I mean they must be so desperate to even dare to post this shit on arxiv. |
|
-10
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Clinking (previous revision, new revision, compare). |
|
-35
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Clinking (previous revision, new revision, compare). |
|
-15
Dear commenters,
|
| Name |
|---|


