| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



This type of diagnostic error (the one in your submission) usually happens in my case whenever I try to access a non-allocated memory space (like trying to access an element not in an array), I can see a lower_bound in your code, have you checked for it's edge cases, like when it throws last?
PS — I am only a noob so take this with a grain of salt
Seems fine to me....have used the same thing many times.....but am not much of an expert myself.....
You do binary search on a not sorted array.
Thanks......I just assumed that input was ordered.....
Still getting WA for this, would really appreciate if someone could point out what is wrong?