Since the editorial is in japenese. I didn't understand the logic of Task E. Please help
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3638 |
| 4 | turmax | 3442 |
| 5 | tourist | 3380 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 7 | strapple | 3350 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | maroonrk | 3310 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
Since the editorial is in japenese. I didn't understand the logic of Task E. Please help
| Name |
|---|



We shall consider each $$$A_i$$$ and count number of $$$j \gt i$$$ such that $$$A_i$$$ and $$$A_j$$$ satisfy the condition. Then the requirement is $$$j - i = A_i + A_j$$$, which can be rewritten as $$$j - A_j = i + A_i$$$. So basically, we need to count the number of $$$j$$$'s for which $$$j-A_j$$$ matches a given value. We can precalculate this value for all indices, store in a map, and query it every time to add to the final answer. Be careful to reduce the count of $$$i - A_i$$$ while moving to the next one. My submission