Hi. I was wondering if there is any upperbound to the size of euler walk with respect to number of vertices. If yes then what will be that maximizing condition?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 136 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 131 |
Hi. I was wondering if there is any upperbound to the size of euler walk with respect to number of vertices. If yes then what will be that maximizing condition?
| Name |
|---|



Auto comment: topic has been updated by venkycodes (previous revision, new revision, compare).
` the number of times any node will be added to the euler walk is equal to number of its children every tree + 1 for non leaf nodes and 2 times for leaves (for upper bound we can assume that number of times a node occurs in a euler walk is equal to Nc + 2 where NcI is the number of children of a node I) for each node we can safely assume that every child gives it a single contribution and it has 2 contribution from itself in its frequency in euler path
now every node will be child of exactly one node except root (neglect it for now ) and this will contribute one frequency of its parent so total N(number of nodes in tree ) will be added to the euler vector size, and for each node 2 will be added as per above analysis hence at most 2*N will be added to the euler vector so total euler vector size should not increase 3*N
hope it is correct tell me if I am wrong somewhere `
If by "euler walk" you're referring to the Eulerian path/cycle in a general graph, then the length of that is exactly the number of edges in the graph. If you're talking about the Euler tour of a tree, then the number of vertices in the tour is exactly $$$2|V|-1$$$.
can you tell me how it would be exactly 2v-1 ?
There are $$$|V|-1$$$ edges, and we traverse each of them twice. Once going down, and once going back up. So that's a total of $$$2|V|-2$$$ edge traversals. We start out with the root vertex and each time we traverse an edge we add a new vertex, so total is $$$2|V|-1$$$.