In a program if i use /* int *a = new int [n] / (and using delete at the end), the compiler throws sigbart error but if i use / int a[n] */ it compiles successfully ,Why ?
program : https://ideone.com/e.js/lZfJuL
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3390 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | tourist | 3384 |
| 8 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 9 | turmax | 3319 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
In a program if i use /* int *a = new int [n] / (and using delete at the end), the compiler throws sigbart error but if i use / int a[n] */ it compiles successfully ,Why ?
program : https://ideone.com/e.js/lZfJuL
| Name |
|---|



True statement is : typename name[size of array];
It gives warning that it is forbidden in c++(11)
You can use c++(17)
If anyone knows the reason, I would also like to know. I have also faced this problem many times. Nowadays, I am using vector everywhere to prevent all array shit in c++.
If you use
new[]to allocate memory, you must usedelete[](notdelete) to free it.https://ideone.com/e.js/4vTJHE
it is still giving sigabrt or am i doing something wrong ?
There are many
out of bounderror in your code.For example, at line 10:
cin >> a[i]can crash your program wheni = n.Please remember that index in C++ is start from zero.