Does Arrays.parallelSort() gives better performance than Arrays.sort() on codeforces?
Since parallelSort optimizes performance on multicore processors, does that work here?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3976 |
2 | tourist | 3815 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3614 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3514 |
7 | Benq | 3482 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3382 |
9 | gamegame | 3374 |
10 | heuristica | 3357 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | Um_nik | 161 |
3 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
Does Arrays.parallelSort() gives better performance than Arrays.sort() on codeforces?
Since parallelSort optimizes performance on multicore processors, does that work here?
Name |
---|
You will try
Yes I WILL :P
As I remember, one of the rules of IOI that if you used multi-threading, the timelimit would be divided on the number of threads. For example, if the timelimit is 1 second and you used 4 threads, the timelimit will be 250ms. I am pretty sure that this also applies to ICPC and online judges. So, I'd say Arrays.sort() would be better as for such, but try yourself C:
Ah I see, I ll try in a virtual comp., thanks.
You're welcome!