if integers A and B satisfy gcd(A,B)=1,why there are always two integers x and y that x*A-y*B=1?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



check extended euclidian algorithm. Because this algorithm works you can see that this statement is always true
Also it can be proved by euler theorem
Let's consider all $$$Ai + Bj \gt 0$$$ and take the smallest of them $$$d = min(Ai + Bj) = Ax + By$$$.
Let $$$r$$$ be a remainder of $$$A$$$ divided by $$$d$$$: $$$A = dA_1 + r$$$, $$$d \gt r \ge 0$$$.
Then $$$r = A - dA_1 = A - (Ax + By)A_1 = A(1 - x) - B(A_1y)$$$, so $$$r$$$ can also be represented as $$$Ai + Bj$$$, or $$$r = 0$$$. The former means that $$$r \ge d$$$ (as $$$d$$$ is minimal such number), which leads to contradiction. Then $$$r = 0$$$, meaning that $$$d$$$ is a divisor of $$$A$$$. The same logic applies to $$$B$$$, so $$$d$$$ is a common divisor of $$$A$$$ and $$$B$$$.
Why is it the greatest? Because if $$$g = gcd(A, B)$$$, then $$$d = Ax + By$$$ $$$\vdots$$$ $$$g$$$, implying $$$d \ge g$$$.
Well, it's Bézout's identity。 You can search it on the Internet.