I tried to solve a classic probjem by using dijkstra with set, but got TLE.
I could not find out the reason why. Here is my code: Submission 65475444
Can you suggest any reasons? Thank you!
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3976 |
2 | tourist | 3815 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3614 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3514 |
7 | Benq | 3482 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3382 |
9 | gamegame | 3374 |
10 | heuristica | 3357 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | Um_nik | 161 |
3 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
I tried to solve a classic probjem by using dijkstra with set, but got TLE.
I could not find out the reason why. Here is my code: Submission 65475444
Can you suggest any reasons? Thank you!
Название |
---|
I just tinkered your solution a little bit and the reason I think you are getting TLE may be due to accessing pair elements more than once I just stored them in variables. For your curiosity, I made the same mistake xd and also you can speed this up using priority queue more here.
cheers :)
That's helpful. Thank you!