Can someone explain or prove, why calculating all possible values for every interval doesn't get TLE?
I think it should be $$$O(n!)$$$.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
6 | Qingyu | 155 |
7 | djm03178 | 152 |
7 | adamant | 152 |
9 | luogu_official | 150 |
10 | awoo | 147 |
Can someone explain or prove, why calculating all possible values for every interval doesn't get TLE?
I think it should be $$$O(n!)$$$.
Name |
---|
There were atmost 10 operators
Ur complexity isn't $$$O(N!)$$$. Infact if u observe the pattern a bit, you'd find that it's complexity never gets multiplied by factor greater than 4 on increasing N by 1. It's pretty much less than $$$O(4^N)$$$ as well, and it's found out to be roughly O(Catalan Number). For more details, u should check the last part of it's official editorial. Ur solution is the DP solution.