cdkrot's blog

By cdkrot, history, 6 years ago, In English

The round has finished. I hope you liked it!

Credits to the round authors and developers:

1110A - Parity. Authored by _h_ and simonlindholm.

1110B - Tape. Authored by _h_ and simonlindholm, development: cdkrot

1110C - Meaningless Operations. Authored by GreenGrape

1110D - Jongmah. Authored by _h_ and simonlindholm, development: KAN and MikeMirzayanov

1110E - Magic Stones. Authored by _h_ and simonlindholm, developed by GreenGrape

1110F - Nearest Leaf. Authored by grphil, developed by vintage_Vlad_Makeev

1110G - Tree-Tac-Toe . Authored by cdkrot and KAN

1110H - Modest Substrings. Authored by _h_ and simonlindholm, development: budalnik

And now, the editorial:

Tutorial is loading...
Tutorial is loading...
Tutorial is loading...
Tutorial is loading...
Tutorial is loading...
Tutorial is loading...
Tutorial is loading...
Tutorial is loading...
  • Vote: I like it
  • +155
  • Vote: I do not like it

| Write comment?
»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +16 Vote: I do not like it

In C, If we precalculate answers for all a=2^x−1 up to m=2^23−1. Shouldn't it be 2^25-1?

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +37 Vote: I do not like it

    Corrected thanks!

    We indeed increased constraints slightly before the contest.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Can you point me to where I am wrong in the third question? My approach was somewhat like this I took the intervals of the numbers ie A[i]-A[i-1] and stored them in one vector and sorted them in decreasing order Now I can make 'K' tape which means I can use K-1 use non attached tapes right... so I took the sum of all the intervals and deleted the first k-1 larger intervals from the sum that is sum-v[0]-v[1]-..v[k-2].. and then printed out (sum+k) as the final answer I got stuck in the test case number 9 ... Thanks in advance for your help.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +28 Vote: I do not like it

Probably one of the most well written editorial i have ever seen!

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone please explain the solution of B in more detail?

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

    Suppose, We have a stick with 100 cm length and 8 broken points,

    .........10.12.... .....30....35..... .......80.....86......93.........100...

    Since, there are 8 broken points and each point takes 1cm, at the very least we need 8cm tape to fix them. But with the constraint of number of tapes, we will have to cover a segment instead of a point. In the process, we will end up covering some unbroken points. So, total covered points will be the broken points + the points which fall under those segments that we picked to cover due to the constraint.

    Consider the following cases -

    Case 1: k = 8

    We have 8 tapes to use. So, there is no point wasting tape on unbroken points. Just cut 8 tapes of 1 cm, and fix the broken points. So, we are only using 8 cm of tape, no tape wasted. Cool!

    Case 2: k = 7

    We have 7 tapes to use. Now, we are 1 piece short. So, we will fix a segment with one tape (instead of just a point) and for rest of the broken points we can just put 1cm pieces.

    So, how do we choose that special segment? The goal is to waste as little as possible tape. Looking at the pipe above, we would like to cover 10.12, just wasting a 1cm tape. This will make us to cover point 11 which is not broken. But there is no better way.

    So, how much tape we are using now? 8 broken, 1cm points + 1 extra 1cm point = 9cm

    Case 3: k = 6

    We have 6 tapes to use. Using the same approach on Case 2, we have to pick another segment. 30....35 is our next best option, because we are justing wasting 4cm tape in the middle.

    Thus 8cm legit broken points + 1cm in the middle of 10.12 and 4cm in the middle of 30....35 = 13 cm

    So, we will be needing to cover up the short amount of tape, and we will choose the segments which come with little waste of tape. To find those segments, we need to list all b[i+1] — b[i] — 1, meaning the lengths of non-broken segments. Now, we will just cover the smallest (n-k) of the segments we need to.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Thanks for fast tutorials

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

can someone explain tape (2 question) in better way

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    hey I will explain it with help of one example; let n=10, n=35, k=5; b[i]={1 2 5 6 9 11 13 15 23 27} broken segments; 1_2__5_6___9__11__13__15________23___27_ (where you have to repair I have put that integer no.)
    if you have value of k more than n (k>n), then you can easily cut the 10 segment of 1cm so it will very less tap require(only total 10cm tap required=10cm(1cm+1cm+1cm+1cm+1cm+1cm+1cm+1cm+1cm+1cm). But here the value of k is 5 so you have to cut 5 segment such that all broken part should cover.
    1_2__5_6___9__11__13__15________23___27_ (where you have to repair I have put that integer no.)
    now if you cut 1cm of 10 segment tap it is less tap required but you can cut only 5 tap segment because k value is 5.
    so you will cut 5 segment such that segment cover max length with small tap. now a[i]=b[i+1]-b[i] So a[i]={1,3,1,3,2,2,2,8,4} so by sorting it a[i]={1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4,8} So you will repair first all that segment which are very near means 1 and 2, 5 and 6, and so on.. you can cut the tap at most five times(k value), so your target is with this five segment you have to repair the stick.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

Now consider the case when a=2x−1. This implies (a⊕b)+(a&b)=a, hence it's sufficient to find the largest proper divisor of a — it will be the desired answer.

Why is that implied in this case?

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    When a=2^x-1,it's binary will have all bits as 1.So, a&b equals b and (a xor b) equals a-b.

    • »
      »
      »
      6 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Thanks for quick response!

      Why is the largest proper divisor the answer? Does it relate to the Extended Euclidean algorithm?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        6 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

        Notice that when b is divisor of a,a-b will also be the divisor of a. So,maximum possible gcd(a-b,b)=largest divisor of a.

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          6 years ago, # ^ |
          Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

          I think you meant that, when b is a divisor of a, a - b will be divisible by b, didn't you?

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    gcd(a-b, b) eqaul to b when b is factor of a.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Can you point me to where I am wrong in the third question? My approach was somewhat like this I took the intervals of the numbers ie A[i]-A[i-1] and stored them in one vector and sorted them in decreasing order Now I can make 'K' tape which means I can use K-1 use non attached tapes right... so I took the sum of all the intervals and deleted the first k-1 larger intervals from the sum that is sum-v[0]-v[1]-..v[k-2].. and then printed out (sum+k) as the final answer I got stuck in the test case number 9 ... Thanks in advance for your help.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +21 Vote: I do not like it

I expected more than on G. Since it is just working with cases. The idea is obvious.

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +29 Vote: I do not like it

    Well, yes, but there are several cute ideas along the way (that the degrees are small and and the idea about reducing the problem to uncolored vertices only, which is not mandatory to get AC, but helps greatly)

    • »
      »
      »
      6 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it -9 Vote: I do not like it

      can you explain part B

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        6 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +30 Vote: I do not like it

        But there is an editorial written already...

        Ask some concrete question at least.

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          6 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          What I want to know is, why have people stored the differences as b[i] — b[i — 1] — 1 and added n to the answer?

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            6 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            Looks fine to me, basically you need to spend tape to cover the broken segments themselves ( + n in the end) and then you only care about which gapes between segments are "collapsed" into single tape part and which are not.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Can you point me to where I am wrong in the third question? My approach was somewhat like this I took the intervals of the numbers ie A[i]-A[i-1] and stored them in one vector and sorted them in decreasing order Now I can make 'K' tape which means I can use K-1 use non attached tapes right... so I took the sum of all the intervals and deleted the first k-1 larger intervals from the sum that is sum-v[0]-v[1]-..v[k-2].. and then printed out (sum+k) as the final answer I got stuck in the test case number 9 ... Thanks in advance for your help.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +21 Vote: I do not like it

Anybody solved D with greedy?

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In D, Can you please explain the statement — So we can assume that there are at most 2 triples of type [x,x+1,x+2] for each x.

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    It means that given some x, it isn't necessary to try choosing the triplet [x, x+1, x+2] more than 2 times. Because for k > 2 (assume km = k mod 3), k[x, x+1, x+2] is equivalent to km[x, x+1, x+2] + [x, x, x] + [x+1, x+1, x+1] + [x+2, x+2, x+2].

    • »
      »
      »
      6 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      what do you mean by it doesn't make sense ? what will happen if we choose triplet (say) 3 times ?

      And how dp state is formulated ? can you describe a little bit.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        6 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        As k[x, x+1, x+2] is equivalent to km[x, x+1, x+2] + (k-km)[x] + (k-km)[x+1] + (k-km)[x+2], you can use this observation to apply simple dp that tries to take a triplet [x, x+1, x+2] at most only 2 times, and gives you the same optimal answer.

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          6 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          so , in the optimal answer there will be no triplet like [x,x,x] ?

          do we have to form triplets only using [x,x+1,x+2] . only it will give optimal answer ?

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            6 years ago, # ^ |
            Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

            In the dp when you consider element x, you make 3 trials. In the jth trial (j ranges from 0 to 2), you try to take the triplet [x, x+1, x+2] j times (if minimum(count(x), count(x+1), count(x+2)) >= j), and you add to the jth trial's result. So basically, what is left from x in the jth trial is just consumed in the form of triplets [x, x, x].

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              6 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              can you explain by writitng the recurrence relation for dp ?

              • »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                6 years ago, # ^ |
                  Vote: I like it +16 Vote: I do not like it

                One possible way:

                Let dp[i][j][k] be the maximum count of triplets that can be formed if you start at value i, j occurrences of value i and k occurrences of value i + 1 are consumed in the form of triplets [x, x + 1, x + 2] where x < i. And let co[i] be the initial count of value i occurrences.

                For 0 ≤ l ≤ 2, if min(co[i] - j - l, co[i + 1] - k - l, co[i + 2] - l) ≥ 0, (where dp[i][j][k] is initially 0). The answer is dp[1][0][0] (Loop order: i = m → i = 1).

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              6 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              Sir, why are you adding floor((count(x) — j)/3) to the jth trial?

              • »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                6 years ago, # ^ |
                  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

                Because you consumed j occurrences of x in form of triplets [x, x + 1, x + 2]. So you want to consume what is left from x in form of triplets [x, x, x] (and if 2 or 1 occurrences of x are left at the end, you will not use them). This is equivalent to taking .

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

Fast editorial.Great!

»
6 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

Hi everybody,

In case anybody needs practice with B, AtCoder Beginner Contest 117 had a very similar problem here.

Here is my editorial for Problem C. I believe it is easier to understand than the editorial provided here. Let me know if you have any doubts. :)

Here is my editorial for E.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +9 Vote: I do not like it

In C, if a=2^x . Then as per "Denote the highest bit of a as x (that is largest number x, such that 2^x≤a) and consider b=(2^x−1)⊕a. It's easy to see that if a≠2^x−1 then 0<b<a holds." b=2^(x+1)-1. which does not hold in between 0 and a.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Has anyone solved "D" using greedy approach? If yes, can you please share!

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

how to dp in AC automaton? how to calculate the answer of all the current suffixes? Could you explain in details. thanks cdkrot

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In C, we denote x as 2^x <= a, but then the explanation states the following: "consider the case when a=(2^x)-1". Could someone explain what they exactly mean here?

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    It should read "consider the case when a=2^(x+1)-1". I was also confused by that. Basically, a is a string of 1s in binary.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

can someone tall the c++ codes for 2nd and 3rd question, maybe with comments and steps will be more helpful

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

I think in C editorial, meaning of x should be the smallest number such that 2x > a.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

Thanks for the editorial. I didn't realize the editorial was already out, cause I didn't see the "Recent actions" so much. Adding a link to the original announcement blog post ( http://codeforces.me/blog/entry/65059 ) would be helpful :)

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -11 Vote: I do not like it

In fact, we can use a simple way to solve the problem C.
Although this way is not very good.

#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
int wyj[25] = {3,7,15,31,63,127,255,511,1023,2047,4095,8191,16383,32767,65535,131071,262143,524287,1048575,2097151,4194303,8388607,16777215,33554431,67108863};
int qwq[25] = {1,1,5,1,21,1,85,73,341,89,1365,1,5461,4681,21845,1,87381,1,349525,299593,1398101,178481,5592405,1082401,22369621};
bool check[67108869];
int ans(int x)
{
    if(x == 1)  return 0;
    if(x == 2)  return 3;
    if(check[x])
    {
        for(int i = 0; i < 25; i++)
            if(wyj[i] == x)
                return qwq[i]; 
    }
    else
        for(int i = 0; i < 25; i++)
            if(x <= wyj[i])
                return wyj[i];
    return -1;
}
int main()
{
    for(int i = 0; i < 25 ; i++)
        check[wyj[i]] = 1;
    int q, tby;
    scanf("%d",&q);
    for(int i = 1; i <= q; i++)
    {
        scanf("%d",&tby);
        printf("%d\n",ans(tby));
    }
    return 0;
}
»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone explain me the intuition behind the process in problem E ? Its hard to come up with such an idea

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Please correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that in C the given editorial solution leads to wrong answer. For eg. if a=11 then given solution would give b=12. Instead it should have been b=4 (which we get by complimenting binary rep of a=11, considering significant bits).

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone please explain the solution to D in more detail? (Like the exact dp equation and its initial values) My mind got a bit mixed up...

»
6 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Could someone explain how to come up with such a dp state in problem D?I'm curious because I can't figure it out.

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone elaborate more on E? I can't quite understand why this equations proves that you need to check array difference.

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Hello!You can try some more complicate examples to find that it's obvious that the array difference with the first and the last number determines the result.By the way, there is a conclusion:if you can exchange any two neighbor elements in a array, you can obtain any permutation of this array.I help this helps:)

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

please someone elaborate more on F

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I was trying to solve problem 1110F - Nearest Leaf offline, using centroid decomposition but is giving me TLE 49838550, any ideas? I know it might sound as an overkill but still it's complexity is something about O(NlgNlgN + QLgNlgN). thanks

»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In Problem B, we will calculate the differences between every two adjacent broken points and store them in a sort array of size n-1. Now lets assume that we need to cover all the broken points with one piece of tape. For this the answer will be [difference of first and last element of the given array + 1] . Now we will optimize the answer as we have the chance to us at most k pieces of tape. We will subtract [x-1] form the answer for each of the last [k-1] elements of sorted array (where x is an element of the sorted array).

Code Snippet

    int n,k;
    long long m;
    cin>>n>>m>>k;
    long long arr[n];
    for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
        cin>>arr[i];
    }
    long long brr[n-1];

    for(int i=0;i<n-1;i++){
        brr[i]=arr[i+1]-arr[i];
    }

    sort(brr,brr+n-1);
    long long ans=arr[n-1]-arr[0]+1;

    for(int i=n-2;i>n-k-1;i--){
        ans-=brr[i]-1;
    }
    cout<<ans;
»
6 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In question 1110A-Parity , can someone explain what is the error in my code :

  long double b;
    long long int i,j,k,n=0;
    cin>>b>>k;
    long double a[k+5];
    for(i=0;i<k;i++)
        cin>>a[i];
    for(i=k-1,j=0;i>=0 || j<k;i--,j++)
    {
        n+=(a[i]*pow(b,j));
    }
    if(n%2==0)
        cout<<"even";
    else
        cout<<"odd";

It is giving wrong answer in one of the test cases.

  • »
    »
    6 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +13 Vote: I do not like it

    For the sake of precision, don't use pow() with integers, ever.

»
6 years ago, # |
Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Problem D.

Why does my solution in java fails in memory if it uses just MAX*5*3 of integers? https://codeforces.me/contest/1110/submission/51139125

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Because recursive calls themself also consumes O(N) memory in total. Each call there are multiple ints used, such as the parameter passed in, local variable, etc.

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 6   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

GreenGrape For 1110C — Meaningless Operations, Can you explain Why you take b=(a xor (2^x-1)) it looks bias,can you explain it more?

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    We try and make (a xor b) = 2^x-1 if possible{when a!= 2^x-1},since we notice that if (a xor b)=2^x-1, then (a & b) is 0, and gcd(x,0) = x Now, since (a xor b) = 2^x-1, b = (a xor 2^x-1)

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

hey guys!!! can anyone pls tell why binary search doesnt work for the Problem B (Tape)

My Code for the same

»
11 months ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

IMO newbies,pupil should not be allowed to participate in global round, IMO it would be too much of pushing their limits and it may backfire their motivation It should be considere at par with Div1