| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



std::map sorts key values, so while iterating them you go from less to bigger and that's what you need for this problem. However, unordered_map does not sort them and it leads to WA.
TooNewbie but why we need order to be sorted . why we need to iterate from lesser to higher . ?
You need to minimize the value of mp[1] since the possibility of traveling to that point is enough to visit all positions. While considering the values from lower to higher and if you had 1 in your map, it will appear earlier, consequently, you will find more optimal choices for mp[1].
okay , i understand . basically u r saying , for a particular mp[gcd] value , we have to check all pair , if we use un.map then some values may skip which will reduce our optimallity .
for the help.