I'v tried to solve this problem from 4 or 5 days, but the only solution that I'v wrote finish running in 84 seconds using Segmented Sieve.
So is there any hints or resources to start working on the correct solution?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | djm03178 | 152 |
I'v tried to solve this problem from 4 or 5 days, but the only solution that I'v wrote finish running in 84 seconds using Segmented Sieve.
So is there any hints or resources to start working on the correct solution?
Name |
---|
You don't actually need to find all primes to cimpute the sum. E.g.here is a description of an approach, that only takes O(n^0.75) time. Link
Thank you for the link, but can you explain the method used? because I don't understand it.
What exactly didn't you understand? The only method used here is DP.
They just define a function that does a bit more than just a summation of the primes. S(v, p) is the sum of all numbers between 2 and v which are still in the sieve if you remove all multiples of all primes ≤ p. Every non-prime number below n has a factor , so the answer to the problem is .
And for this function it is not too hard to come up with a recursive definition. If you don't understand it, just try it with a few numbers. E.g. for S(25, 3), and see what numbers they sum up, and what numbers you sum up with S(25, 3), and which numbers with 3 * S(8, 2) and 3 * S(2, 2).
Implementation was not described in the link. But I assume that a top-down DP approach is fast enough.