| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 131 |
| Name |
|---|



I don't know, but 2349041 is your solution.
I replaced scanf() with cin>> and got AC. can't I use scanf() when i declare a __int64 type variable?
u can use scanf("%I64d", &x). but if ur compiler is g++ in linux, you may have to declare long long instead of __int64, and the input and output should be "%lld", but dont forget to replace "%lld" by "%I64d" when u solve problems in this oj. that's one of the difference between two compilers.