| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3390 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | tourist | 3384 |
| 8 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 9 | turmax | 3319 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 5 | AmShZ | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 9 | BledDest | 132 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
| Name |
|---|



I don't know, but 2349041 is your solution.
I replaced scanf() with cin>> and got AC. can't I use scanf() when i declare a __int64 type variable?
u can use scanf("%I64d", &x). but if ur compiler is g++ in linux, you may have to declare long long instead of __int64, and the input and output should be "%lld", but dont forget to replace "%lld" by "%I64d" when u solve problems in this oj. that's one of the difference between two compilers.