Hello, can anybody give me hints for this problem? I think heavy light decomposition could handle the type-1 query, but how about the type-2 query?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 157 |
6 | Qingyu | 156 |
7 | djm03178 | 151 |
7 | adamant | 151 |
9 | luogu_official | 150 |
10 | awoo | 147 |
Name |
---|
My (author's) solution uses the fact that there are not many nodes having many children and nodes with not so many children are easy to handle.
Of course, as an author I don't want to reveal the full solution but I think this hint is enough for you to get it. I am happy to see many different approaches that didn't occur to me, including a good portion of HLD solutions.
Thanks for your hint. I'll try it again.
I solved this using this technique e.e in $$$O(n \log^2 n)$$$, I can optimize it to $$$O(n \log n)$$$ using this blog.