Hello Codeforces community,
Here is a problem: http://www.spoj.com/problems/SOLVING/
How would you solve it? I don't want to skew your view, so I just leave the question without mentioning my (apparently too slow) solution.
Thanks, tom
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3976 |
2 | tourist | 3815 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3614 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3514 |
7 | Benq | 3482 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3382 |
9 | gamegame | 3374 |
10 | heuristica | 3357 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | Um_nik | 161 |
3 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
Hello Codeforces community,
Here is a problem: http://www.spoj.com/problems/SOLVING/
How would you solve it? I don't want to skew your view, so I just leave the question without mentioning my (apparently too slow) solution.
Thanks, tom
Name |
---|
Hm?
Did you try using A-Star algorithm? I think search space is too big even for this algorithm but you can give it a try. Since optimal solution is not required you may use non-consistent heuristic to speed up the search.
Yes. My algorithm looks as follows:
My heuristic is simple sum of manhattan distances between current point and destination point for tiles <= i.
It works well except two last rows. Sometimes it takes a lot of time to finish them.
My bad XDDDD, ignore, its stupid
Look at the constraints, board can be up to 10x10