Codeforces Round 1133 (Div. 1, Div. 2) is coming soon! Register here. ×

mogers's blog

SWERC'2016 contest data is now available
By mogers, history, 10 years ago, In English

Hi all,

SWERC 2016's problems, solutions and I/O are now available on the contest website.

Any feedback is welcome.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +18
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
10 years ago, hide # |
← Rev. 2  
Vote: I like it +17 Vote: I do not like it

Already in Gym:

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    10 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I'm the author of problem D. One of my solutions is giving WA but should give AC because it is within the 10^-3 eps. My guess is that the special corrector in Gym is using a 10^-6 eps?

    I'm not used to use the Gym, not sure if we can see the tests where it fails like in a normal CF round.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      10 years ago, hide # ^ |
      ← Rev. 2  
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Your solution outputs -0.000000 while it should be 1.000000.

      You can see the tests if you have coach account, there are three ways to get it:

      • become orange
      • become violet AND play 30 rated rounds
      • ask Mike personally
      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        10 years ago, hide # ^ |
        ← Rev. 2  
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        That's weird. It works on my computer. I'll check if there's any undefined behaviour in this code.

        edit: indeed, it passes with g++ 6.2 but wa with g++ 5.1

        → Reply
  • »
    »
    10 years ago, hide # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2  
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Could you double check the way submissions from the onsite contest were imported?

    I noticed that ENSU Ulm 1 first submission on problem D has the wrong time. 3:13:00 instead of 4:25:33 (submission 395), there is no submission at 3:13:00 from any team.

    edit: same with their submission to G. It is shown at 01:50:31 but it was actually at 4:59:15.

    → Reply