| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
| Name |
|---|



Auto comment: topic has been translated by Kane (original revision, translated revision, compare)
I first tried solving it with double hashing with primes 31 and 37. I got WA on Test 9. I changed the modulo, again WA on Test 9, so I realized it was because some hash was becoming zero along the way, and that's certainly not good when hashing...
My workaround was to make a list of primes and choose two randomly until all hashes are positive. I got AC with that. Here's the code -> C++ Double Hashing
I understand that you're asking specifically for the hashing solution, so you probably already know, but this problem can be solved simply by adding a copy of S to itself and then running KMP.
Here's the code for this solution: KMP Code (the hashing solution is above)