sa +president_tree + brute_force Accepted this problem, seems it is O(n*poly(log(n)),but it needs some proof...,there is litte possibilaty it is O(n^2*poly(log(n))).
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
sa +president_tree + brute_force Accepted this problem, seems it is O(n*poly(log(n)),but it needs some proof...,there is litte possibilaty it is O(n^2*poly(log(n))).
| Name |
|---|



president_tree ?? I`m missed smth definitely interesting.
My approach is very brute_force,and it is an online algorithm:
First build suffix array and lcp[], for each query [li,ri],lets find the nearest right rank of position (lm=li), in the position,interval [li+1,ri],we denote this positon,pos,then find lcp=lcp[li][pos], then lm=max(pos, ri-lcp+1), in order to speed up to find the first yes postion, we must deal with parttern str=AAAAAAAA+prefix(A) (this is not legal answer,but currenc lcp value is max.),A is a string,if this pattern is occur we directly get pos=max(pos,len(str)-len(A))..
with this speed up we can get the first yes positon (pos+lcp>ri) we only jump log(n) times, but this is not the final answer, this is a lcp_max() answer but not the left most answer, so we must continue to go left, denote lm=max(lm,ri-lcp+1),rm=min(rm,sa[pos]-1), similarly there may occur str=AAAAAAA+prefix(A) (this is a legal answer), we can binary_search to find the left most legal answer (jump lenth(A) positon),and denote rm with this left most legal postion.
this is an online algorithm and I have test for each query the maximum iteration times is not exceed 40, so maybe this is an O(q*Log(n)^log(n)) algorithm...
and seems editorial is an offline parralell binary search approach, this is interesting.