I solved TopBiologist by recursion. I want to know if there is any iterative approach? We will need to run loop 6 times to generate sequence of length 6. Is there any shorter way to do this?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3976 |
2 | tourist | 3815 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3614 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3514 |
7 | Benq | 3482 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3382 |
9 | gamegame | 3374 |
10 | heuristica | 3357 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | Um_nik | 161 |
3 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
I solved TopBiologist by recursion. I want to know if there is any iterative approach? We will need to run loop 6 times to generate sequence of length 6. Is there any shorter way to do this?
Название |
---|
It's similar to converting numbers into the radix 4.
Thanks. Can we write i th element of an integer array like you wrote for string?
You wrote
s += "ACGT"[x % 4]
I wrote this and got compilation error
for(int i=0;i<4;i++) cout<<{1,2,3,4}[i];
I have found an interesting solution without recursion.