Блог пользователя radhakrishnancegit

Автор radhakrishnancegit, 15 лет назад, По-английски

Hi,

We would like to invite you all to participate in Kurukshetra OPC 2012 (An Individual Contest ), a 4-hour acm-icpc style online programming competition, which is organized as a part of Kurukshetra 2012 , the Technical fest of College Of Engineering Guindy, Anna University,India. Start time : Tuesday ,31st Jan 2012,9 pm IST . [ Find when it starts in your time zone Time in other Zones]

Contest Page: http://www.spoj.pl/KOPC12/

Problem Setters: innocentboy2,sundargates

Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]

Problems : 6-7 problems with mix of easy (2), medium (3) and hard (1-2) levels.

Prize Money in INR
First Place: 15000 INR
II place : 5000 INR
III place : 3000 INR

We are expecting that a few of you will finish all problems in around 1.5 hours.Considering the coders of our college we extended the duration of the contest to 4 hours

Please ignore this if you came to know about this contest by other means .Sorry for that .

Thanking you.

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +36
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
15 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

A gentle reminder. Contest Started :) Happy Coding :)

»
15 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

Nice contest! I liked it :) Thank you.

I had some hard time with "Combinations" and I still can not solve it. Maybe someone could tell me the idea behind this problem? :)

»
15 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can somebody "red" make this train in Codeforces:Gym?

It will be very nice!!

Thanks a lot!

»
15 лет назад, скрыть # |
Rev. 2  
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Has anybody solved F using DP in O(n^3)? Is the problem in input, should we read using char[]? Thanks.

UPD There is a DP solution in O(n^2). The large input is not guilty.

»
15 лет назад, скрыть # |
Rev. 4  
Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

I am very amazed how this wrong greedy solution for problem C get accepted:

For digits 9 --> 1, put them in smallest places that no numbers were put before.

That solution failed the test case: 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0, and failed every random test case I generated (against the modified D's bipartie matching algorithm I used to calculate the best length of the number).

So, either the test case is super super weak, or the author's solution is wrong.