#define foreach(ite,sets) for(__typedef(sets.begin()) ite=sets.begin();ite!=sets.end();ite++)
Do you like this code?
gl & hf
Do you like this code?
gl & hf
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



STL for_each
Surely there are far more languages, I just suppose that java syntax would not be radically new to C++ programmer and performance decrease would not be radical too... Note that I am not against C++ (I use it for more than 10 years already), but sometimes I feel that there is too much plus-pluses for one poor programmer... ;-)
int[] a = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
for (int x : a) {
x *= 2; // actually elements of array don't change
}