GP of Ekateinburg has just finished. Let's discuss problems here. How to solve H?
(Russian version of the post contains my anger about statements).
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
GP of Ekateinburg has just finished. Let's discuss problems here. How to solve H?
(Russian version of the post contains my anger about statements).
| Name |
|---|



Problem H: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schreier%E2%80%93Sims_algorithm
Well, is it allowed to use such tasks in contests? This task is just a copy of Schreier and Sims' idea and there is zero originality. I hope authors to come up with original tasks.
And problem I — I believe it's not a good idea to try to separate MCMF and Hungarian. Both are O(n^3).
MCMF worked 0.336 seconds in my case, not even close to TL (and I believe it can be still optimized a lot, by changing long long to int etc.).
Interesting fact: most of the people who had issues with MCMF fitting into the time limit never have issues with
long long.Were they actually trying to separate them though? I passed with Dijkstra on Set in my Min Cost Flow. So it was even O(N^3logN).
OK maybe my implementation was bad — is O(E log E) dijkstra faster than O(V^2) in practice?
With set: 1.2s
V^2: 0.49s
MCMF with Ford-Bellman works 0.8
Non-deterministic?
where can see the problems?