int limit = 1 << n;
for (int i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
if (Integer.bitCount(i) >= 3) {
System.out.println(i);
}
}
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | nor | 152 |
int limit = 1 << n;
for (int i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
if (Integer.bitCount(i) >= 3) {
System.out.println(i);
}
}
Name |
---|
There's technically no asymptotically better way. Note that the number of integers in that range that have bitCount < 3 is So the total number of integers you would be printing out is O(2n) - O(n2) = O(2n), which is at least necessary asymptotically.